Blood Rites
Book Notes Written with a loving hand by kitt some time around 18:20 on 12 May 2017Yep, rereading the Dresden series. This is Book Six
Dresden spends some of his time on a porn movie set, and while I want to think that Butcher was trying to convey that, hey, these women characters were strong, doing a trade they enjoyed, were compensated well for, and it was any other job, I really didn't feel any affinity for that particular aspect of the plot.
We do get a lot of background in the story, and a bit of foreshadowing on a number of future plot plots, which is great. We meet Laura Raith, thanks to Thomas. And Mouse! Oh boy, scads of flying, flaming poo. That's a visual for the ages.
This book ranks as a fan level recommendation. It's about Harry, I'm going to read it (whether Dresden, Potter, or Hole, let's admit it).
Human violence was at its most hideous when a woman was on the receiving end, and supernatural predators were even worse.
Location 1424
“Trite but true—you don’t know what you have until it’s gone. People change. The world changes. And sooner or later you lose people you care about. If you don’t mind some advice from someone who doesn’t know much about families, I can tell you this: Don’t take yours for granted. It might feel like all of them will always be there. But they won’t.”
Location 1723
I had to be paranoid, which in this instance was another word for smart.
Location 2735
Sooner or later I’d be old and frail, maybe even tired of living. And dying. I would have no one to share it with me, or hold my hand when I was afraid.
Location 3469
for the first time I heard something like real anger in his voice. That was something to be noted. When kind men grow angry, things are about to change.
Location 3746
“I wouldn’t be betting my life on it otherwise. You’ve got my back, Murph. Shut up and dance.”
Location 4738
But several years of staring out at the darkness had showed her that the law was both blind and deaf to some of the nastier parts of the world. She’d seen things that moved in the shadows, perverting the purpose of the law to use it as a weapon against the people she had sworn to defend. Her faith had taken a beating, or she wouldn’t even have considered stepping outside the boundaries of her authority. And she knew it.
Location 4759
That knowledge cost her dearly. There weren’t any tears in her eyes, but I knew that they were there, on the inside, while she mourned the death of her faith.
Location 4762
“I don’t know the right thing to do,” she said. “Neither do I,” I said. “But someone has to do something. And we’re the only ones around. Either we choose to take a stand now or we choose to stand around at all the funerals regretting it later.”
Location 4764
That the power born into any wizard carried with it the responsibility to use it to help his fellow man. That there were things worth protecting, defending, and that the world could be more than a jungle where the strong thrived and the weak were devoured.
Location 4905
“For the record,” Kincaid said, “I was hoping for an answer that vaguely hinted at a specific tactical doctrine rather than spouting off general campaign objectives.”
Location 4927
An angel, blazing with fury and savage strength, spun toward the Renfield, her eyes shining with azure flame, a shaft of fire in her hands. The angel was dressed in soiled robes smudged with smoke and blood and filth, no longer white. She bled from half a dozen wounds, and moved as if in terrible pain. Murphy.
Location 5052
“There’s what’s right,” the old man said, “and then there’s what’s necessary. They ain’t always the same.”
Location 5795
The world might be vicious and treacherous and deadly, but it couldn’t kill laughter. Laughter, like love, has power to survive the worst things life has to offer. And to do it with style.
Location 5932
“It is, after all, a great deal more pleasurable to conquer than to rule. And defiant women can be conquered again and again before they break.”
Location 6408
I had started feeling a little crowded already, sure. But I took a deep breath and brushed it back. Thomas wouldn’t be here too long, and the dog was certainly a lot smaller than Mister. I could handle a little claustrophobia.
Location 7246
Hike With Jonathan
Blog Instead of being asleep at 20:53 on 10 May 2017, kitt created this:Jonathan has a new camera, so OF COURSE my response is "Let's go hiking!" So we did.
We did "hike." New path that was surprisingly flat.
Jonathan used his camera, and struggled a bit with the different controls (Sony) from his previous camera (Nikon).
Best part? Smoochies.
Second best part?
Those calves!
How Are You?
Blog Written with a loving hand by kitt some time around 18:19 on 10 May 2017Okay, there's this post going around about Sheryl Sandberg declaring the informal greeting of 'How are you?' as an insensitive question. She then tells everyone what to do instead. The post starts out:
Most of us ask one go-to question when we exchange pleasantries with friends, coworkers, and peers:
"How are you?"
The question may seem harmless, but it tends to lead to one socially acceptable answer:
"I'm fine."
The problem is that "I'm fine" often is not the truth. And if you ask this question of someone who is dealing with a lot in their personal life, it may come across as insensitive.
And that last paragraph describes the actual problem. The problem is not that people are asking, "How are you?" The problem is that Sandberg is incapable of telling the truth when asked the question. She isn't the only person who defaults to "I'm fine" or "I'm good" or the grammatically incorrect, "I'm well." The default answer of "I'm fine" is fine because normally the people asking, "How are you?" don't really care how you are. They are giving a greeting, and expecting "I'm fine" as the greeting's response. Her whole argument is saying, "Hi!" as a response to "Hello" is socially insensitive. It's not, it's a socially-learned call and response behaviour.
There are people who ask, "How are you?" and they want to know how you are doing. Those are the people you respond with how you are actually doing, the ones who you have earned your trust, the ones you can be vulnerable with and know they are interested in your answer. Everyone else gets the "I'm fine" response and that's fine.
So, Sandberg was in a bad place because her husband died. She was hurting. That's normal and a socially acceptable response. Telling the world the socially acceptable response of "I'm fine" to a generic greeting is insensitive is a stupid, overly-pc response to the world from the lens of her hurt.
Am I victim-blaming by suggesting Sandberg suck it up and STFU already about this? I don't think so, given she's the one telling other women to suck it up and STFU about injustices in tech world. She should grow a pair, as she told the rest of us to do.
Today's No No No
Blog Yeah, kitt finished writing this at 13:25 on 9 May 2017A London-based startup is working on AR-integrated banner ads. B------ is working with automotive brands to launch a banner ad that shows the image of the inside of the car that can be engaged with.
JFC no. We spend our whole lives these days bombarded by someone trying to f---ing sell us something. How about having a space that isn't commercialized?
I would so not want a floating image in front of my face when I'm driving, even driving virtually.
How to Save Thousands of Dollars a Year
Blog kitt decided around 14:00 on 7 May 2017 to publish this:Okay, I'm miffed.
I'm annoyed, bordering on angry, actually. Not really any REAL reason to be, but I am.
See, I was a huge Kickstarter fan. Like over 700 projects backed huge Kickstarter fan. At one point, I was the 57th most prolific backer at Kickstarter.
And then they refused a project of a friend of mine. Said project had one reward in particular that was specifically for me, so that I could commemorate my 700th backed project with a reward from her. And Kickstarter refused to host the project. Well, 100% fuck that.
I pretty much only back project when people personally contact me with an obviously non-form email.
And THEN they come out with this Superbacker moniker for people who have backed a LOT of projects like "OVER TWO HUNDRED PROJECTS."
Guess who doesn't have said Superbacker status?
Right.
Double fuck that.
So, THEN I find out that another friend had a kickstarter project, and despite backing two of his previous projects on the site, I wasn't notified of this next project.
What.
The.
Fuck.
Kickstarter.
Are you TRYING to lose people on the site? Because you're doing a good fucking job at making sure the people who loved your site hate it now.
See?
I am pissed now.